Why the South African Government Must Pay Compensation to Victims of Xenophobia

1. South Africa Has a Legal Duty Under International Law

South Africa is a state party to the _International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, These treaties obligate the government to protect the lives, dignity, and property of all persons, within its territory, regardless of nationality.

The xenophobic attacks of 2008, 2015, 2019, and subsequent incidents were not isolated crimes. They were widespread, targeted violence based on national origin. International law is clear: when a state fails to exercise “due diligence” to prevent foreseeable attacks, investigate them thoroughly, and punish perpetrators, it bears responsibility. That responsibility requires full reparation for victims.

2. The Right to an Effective Remedy Is Non-Negotiable
Article 2(3) of the ICCPR and Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantee victims of human rights violations the right to an effective remedy. Prosecuting a handful of perpetrators years later is not effective.

ALSO READ: Special Envoy Amb Charles Omini calls for Calm amidst tension in South Africa & Ghana

An effective remedy includes:
1. Compensation for death, injury, trauma, and destroyed businesses
2. Restitution of property where possible
3. Rehabilitation including medical and psychological support
4. Guarantees of non-repetition through policy reform

To date, the vast majority of xenophobia victims have received none of these.

ALSO READ: Amb. Charles Omini Blames Rising Insecurity on Government Negligence, Calls for Urgent Security Reforms

3. Precedent Exists in South African and International Law
The South African government has paid compensation when its failures led to death and loss:
– Marikana Massacre: R1.17 billion paid to families
– Life Esidimeni Tragedy: R1.2 million per family for state negligence

International bodies have ordered states to compensate victims when authorities failed to protect minorities from mob violence. The same standard applies here. The lives of African migrants cannot be worth less than those of citizens.

4. Compensation Upholds Pan-African Solidarity and the Rule of Law
South Africa is a founding member of the African Union and SADC. The AU Constitutive Act demands “promotion of social justice” and “respect for human life.” The AfCFTA depends on safe movement of people and goods across Africa.

Paying compensation is not charity. It is a legal obligation and a political statement that South Africa stands for the rule of law, for Pan-Africanism, and for the principle that _no one is illegal_ when it comes to the right to life.

5. Our Demand
We call on the Government of South Africa to:
1. Establish a Xenophobia Victims’ Compensation Fund within 90 days, with transparent criteria for claims.
2. Publicly acknowledge state failure to protect foreign nationals during documented waves of violence.
3. Table a full report in Parliament detailing arrests, prosecutions, and reparations since 2008.
4. Work with OHCHR and the African Commission to implement long-term prevention mechanisms.

In Conclusion
Xenophobia is not just a crime against individuals. It is an attack on the human rights framework South Africa helped build after apartheid. The government cannot condemn xenophobia in words while refusing to remedy it in action.

Compensation is not optional. It is the law.
Justice delayed is justice denied. The time to pay is now.

Signed,
Special Envoy West Africa International Human Rights Protection Service